[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Tor speed

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Tor speed
From: slush <slush@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:19:28 +0100
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 03:19:32 -0500
In-reply-to: <20090213073516.GK12028@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <bd9056300902121658p444e7fdbue96772cdc1702903@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090213073516.GK12028@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Do you know it is same for JonDonym (paid service) as well? Probably yes, but I cannot found any source, my german is worse than english :-)

Well, thanks to info. But it isnt relative with speed issue.

Marek

The problem with JAP is that they are complying with the data
retention laws.

http://blog.pozimski.eu/?p=564=1

References:
- Tor speed
  - From: slush
- Re: Tor speed
  - From: Eugen Leitl

Prev by Author: Tor speed
Next by Author: Re: Tor speed
Previous by thread: Re: Tor speed
Next by thread: Re: Tor speed
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread