[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Tor speed

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Tor speed
From: "Karsten N." <tor-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:20:06 +0100
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 03:20:24 -0500
In-reply-to: <20090213073516.GK12028@xxxxxxxxx>
Openpgp: id=A553C1B7
References: <bd9056300902121658p444e7fdbue96772cdc1702903@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090213073516.GK12028@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: IceDove 1.5.0.14eol (X11/20090105)

Eugen Leitl wrote:
> The problem with JAP is that they are complying with the data
> retention laws.
> 
> http://blog.pozimski.eu/?p=564=1
> 

Not at all. There are data retention free cascades and mixes, which
are complying with the data retention law. The commercial cascades do
not logging, but some free cascades are logging and are marked with
"(DR)" at the status page: https://www.jondos.de/en/status

The interpretation of the data retention law for JAP is not clear at
the moment.

Karsten N.

References:
- Tor speed
  - From: slush
- Re: Tor speed
  - From: Eugen Leitl

Prev by Author: Re: Bittorrent
Next by Author: Re: [OT] JAP backdoor
Previous by thread: Re: Tor speed
Next by thread: Re: Tor speed
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread