[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-talk] Legal problems: TOR relay & Torrents in .de

To: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Legal problems: TOR relay & Torrents in .de
From: grarpamp <grarpamp@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 04:46:51 -0500
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 04:47:04 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=UveE+b9dRIJAWMGd/+l45Rm5qlSwsfQ5r652wnSG55U=; b=CDR3AFTN39/X40B7UOayitnFn2Mr9qOjUI9NzocEGCyACSQQ1W/d7NfaDWLqM5Xtpr SQHN+ukrJ2wvaM8sa2QdLNXtEniJl5mmzQIhbzDISltwtcpErQS0pxVwKzf9elkaW1I0 Ggl4FtlZ5dYB26kf7pr9Am7yWZMIzesKyGDz2m0/hMkiEM8sncZeyr1NZfzaropDVfsv 10frfm3lX2aXY81BV9xyQWjsTUBTS0rgE+ucSlo9VTIyFu1aVApRmONd2oVnkc/Z/k1h sOVR5cphhVAqslseLePwLuikTD3cVQAORoKRsxEFreOI4mgpexKOZV71ZxKFdqtHxHdI h3AQ==
In-reply-to: <5121160E.3040908@xxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk>
List-help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "all discussion about theory, design, and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <CAFgSKDdGuaSj+CpgKt0kJt27WPEVAY_G8Wh0cS+-=Xog1at6tw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <511F7F2C.2020009@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <511FA017.30804@xxxxxxx> <5120F990.5030602@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5121160E.3040908@xxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: tor-talk-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Off topic, except to as possible defences...
Have any of these entities suing people ever produced actual blocks
downloaded by the entity from a peer?
As far as I know all the cases they've tried have been with 'making available'
client screengrabs and tracker scrapes.
What's to say you didn't fakeup a client to make available urandom/zero/null
under some recent boyband album infohash?

Would like to run such a client btw ;)
_______________________________________________
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

References:
- [tor-talk] Legal problems: TOR relay & Torrents in .de
  - From: Hendrik Neumann
- Re: [tor-talk] Legal problems: TOR relay & Torrents in .de
  - From: Nick Sheppard
- Re: [tor-talk] Legal problems: TOR relay & Torrents in .de
  - From: Joe Btfsplk
- Re: [tor-talk] Legal problems: TOR relay & Torrents in .de
  - From: Nick Sheppard
- Re: [tor-talk] Legal problems: TOR relay & Torrents in .de
  - From: Joe Btfsplk

Prev by Author: [tor-talk] Tor hibernation: Unlinking IP changes from TCP state
Next by Author: Re: [tor-talk] please re-consider Tor Trademark policy
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-talk] Legal problems: TOR relay & Torrents in .de
Next by thread: Re: [tor-talk] Legal problems: TOR relay & Torrents in .de
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread