Re: [tor-talk] torsocks 1.3 is tagged and released

[Jacob Appelbaum <jacob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

intrigeri:
> Hi,
> 
> Jacob Appelbaum wrote (12 Feb 2013 19:25:59 GMT) :
>> intrigeri:
>>> A Git tag integrates perfectly with packaging workflow... iff it's the
>>> canonical form of distribution of the complete upstream release.
>>> [...]
> 
>> I'll discuss it with nickm and see what he thinks. A tar.gz isn't too
>> much of a problem but I'm not sure of where I'd put it.
> 
> FTR, I'm waiting for an authoritative upstream answer on this before
> I upload 1.3 to the Debian archive.
> 
> I'm more and more tempted to take the Git tag as the canonical form of
> distribution of the complete upstream release, which it seems to be in
> practice, given there's no tarball that I can find 10 days after the
> release was announced (and again, the Git tag suits me well).
> 

For now, I'd like to suggest that you use the git tag.

All the best,
Jacob
_______________________________________________
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk