Re: [tor-talk] torsocks 1.3 is tagged and released

[intrigeri <intrigeri@xxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

Jacob Appelbaum wrote (12 Feb 2013 19:25:59 GMT) :
> intrigeri:
>> A Git tag integrates perfectly with packaging workflow... iff it's the
>> canonical form of distribution of the complete upstream release.
>> [...]

> I'll discuss it with nickm and see what he thinks. A tar.gz isn't too
> much of a problem but I'm not sure of where I'd put it.

FTR, I'm waiting for an authoritative upstream answer on this before
I upload 1.3 to the Debian archive.

I'm more and more tempted to take the Git tag as the canonical form of
distribution of the complete upstream release, which it seems to be in
practice, given there's no tarball that I can find 10 days after the
release was announced (and again, the Git tag suits me well).

Cheers,
--
  intrigeri
  | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
  | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
_______________________________________________
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk