[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-talk] Bridge: Why not just stateless TCP socket proxy / forwarders?



Has any one heard of OpenFlow? 

http://OpenFlow.org
Http://openflowswitch.org
Http://netfpga.org

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 15, 2012, at 2:54 PM, andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 04:58:56PM +0100, lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote 0.3K bytes in 11 lines about:
> : does Bridge really need to be Tor Servers?
> : Why they can't be just be simpler TCP socket proxy?
> 
> We've been through this already. ;) No, a bridge is
> just a way to reach the tor network from a tor client,
> it can be any proxy or tcp forwarder. I refer you to
> https://blog.torproject.org/blog/strategies-getting-more-bridge-addresses
> again. Specifically, approach four and five.
> 
> -- 
> Andrew
> http://tpo.is/contact
> pgp 0x74ED336B
> _______________________________________________
> tor-talk mailing list
> tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
> 
_______________________________________________
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk