[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: relay tidbits...

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: relay tidbits...
From: coderman <coderman@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 17:48:36 -0700
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 20:48:41 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=8Qf8PzdjdgcGcWw16DjtcE6Q+lVLHpBnoaYp/cIRlUI=; b=ULFQXV1bna1pnDAFleZbgOl5xUgxOpyu2o8L5B2/jJY5yXfgL7WuQpEk4OUH0d9GJ2SrfShv1KtC5jPPYmz7IkqFmFfw4x4qICOj2ZTWSs6eZJ21ibJMMeN6faPrKxyRXV0tBm+pwdjAYiCJtocWzmvGvGng0qdxkxO+pSuPMXM=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=kw0YA0oC7buXSm3H63Z6UCMemtAoFHnWEWxkfSzdv6OGgdF6Uq9pWl0goiEREY3QeRZJowIt1pMYHGL7LrMiQhDJ+ZEhtgOKPZGz7LpK6zbgcPotdDTAfuHkCHeNWGvDA3vY7QvJFUF/4Vwh+EgOLAwALxcaAxpGGyixPbeXeLM=
In-reply-to: <48448333.7070105@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <48432765.20301@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080601234433.GA9948@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <48439D50.1020406@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4ef5fec60806020048x3eb7fff9rb87384eeb8d246e2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <48448333.7070105@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 4:33 PM, luser <luser456@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ...
> could protocols supporting en clair passwords be denied, a la smtp?

see proposal 129: rejecting plaintext ports:
https://www.torproject.org/svn/trunk/doc/spec/proposals/129-reject-plaintext-ports.txt

this would be quite useful, and help Tor fail safe when a user is not
sophisticated enough to understand how their use of Tor might
compromise the privacy of accounts they access.

> is is possible to run a relay on tcp/25?
> how about tcp/21?

sure, why not?

best regards,

Follow-Ups:
- Re: relay tidbits...
  - From: coderman

References:
- relay tidbits...
  - From: luser
- Re: relay tidbits...
  - From: phobos
- Re: relay tidbits...
  - From: luser
- Re: relay tidbits...
  - From: coderman
- Re: relay tidbits...
  - From: luser

Prev by Author: Re: relay tidbits...
Next by Author: Re: relay tidbits...
Previous by thread: Re: relay tidbits...
Next by thread: Re: relay tidbits...
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread