[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Tor memory usage on embedded systems.

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Tor memory usage on embedded systems.
From: "Marco Bonetti" <marco.bonetti@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 09:33:43 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 06 Mar 2009 03:34:11 -0500
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <49B027B7.1020009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <49B027B7.1020009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.6

On Thu, March 5, 2009 20:27, basile wrote:
> These preliminary numbers might be of interest.
Nice work

> I'm going to repeat these measurements, but
> would like some feedback from the community regarding what you'd like to
> see.
Could you run the tests after settings the same BandwidthRate and
BandwidthBurst for all nodes?
I think that a lower rate/burst node should be less used then an higher one.

ciao

-- 
Marco Bonetti
BT3 EeePC enhancing module: http://sid77.slackware.it/bt3/
Slackintosh Linux Project Developer: http://workaround.ch/
Linux-live for powerpc: http://workaround.ch/pub/rsync/mb/linux-live/
My webstuff: http://sidbox.homelinux.org/

My GnuPG key id: 0x86A91047

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Tor memory usage on embedded systems.
  - From: basile

References:
- Tor memory usage on embedded systems.
  - From: basile

Prev by Author: Re: Gsoc Idea: Lunux Tor/Firefox Bundle
Next by Author: Re: When is a relay stable?
Previous by thread: Re: Tor memory usage on embedded systems.
Next by thread: Re: Tor memory usage on embedded systems.
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread