On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:07 PM, <phobos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 10:46:05AM +0100, morphium@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote 0.4K bytes in 13 lines about:
: On the SAME day, a letter of the state attorney was sent to me
: (arrived yesterday), stating I can pick my things they raided about 20
: months ago, on 1. of april (is that a joke now?) because they (the
: state attorney) has lifted the embargo. The raid 20 months ago was due
: to "spreading childporn" (running a Tor node).
To clarify, were you raided because you ran a Tor node or because your
IP address showed up in a website logfile (which was collected by the
police during their anti-child porn sweep)?
(since he may be too bussy to reply…)
My understanding is that he was raided this time because he is the
holder of wikileaks.de and wikilinks has copies of things like the
Australian censorship list (which includes things claimed to be child
porn). Not related to TOR. But he was previously subject to a TOR
related taid.
http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Police_raid_home_of_Wikileaks.de_domain_owner_over_censorship_lists