[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-talk] Tor's reputation problem with pedo, some easy steps the community could take
The New Yorker just helped out for some positive PR surrounding hidden services. Last Monday, they implemented "strongbox." It's a means of sending the New Yorker tips and information without fear of reprisal, since not even the New Yorker can know who someone is as a result of IP address logs. The fundamental tech driving that at the core is Tor's hidden services.
Sorry to resurrect an old discussion. But, this thread came to mind as I was reading about Strongbox this week. With a main stream publication like the New Yorker using Tor's hidden services in order to result in public good, this is a very good piece of PR for Tor that should be emphasized. Here are some links.
----- Original Message -----
From: Roger Dingledine <arma@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2013 3:06 PM
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Tor's reputation problem with pedo,
some easy steps the community could take
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 01:32:59PM -0400, Chris Patti wrote:
> As a newcomer to Tor, as I explored the various onions out there, I felt as
> if practically everywhere I turned there were links taking me to pedo
> sites, IRC channels etc.
I agree with you. Part of what we have done a poor job communicating
is that hidden services are a tiny fraction of overall Tor use. The
wikipedia article on Tor is mostly written by hidden service enthusiasts
(as far as I can tell), which further misleads people.
tor-talk mailing list