[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: ATTN: for-profit Tor operators

Anthony DiPierro writes:

> Actually I would say if anything the opposite is true.  By being an
> operator itself, the EFF has standing to be involved in the cases
> themselves, rather than simply providing free legal support to someone
> else.

You don't need standing to be counsel to a defendant.

The rules for standing (in e.g. intervention) are actually pretty
tricky, and simply being or not being a Tor operator is not necessarily



Attachment: pgp8wSdwOZJUb.pgp
Description: PGP signature