[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: ATTN: for-profit Tor operators
On 11/28/05, Chris Palmer <chris@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Anthony DiPierro writes:
> > Actually I would say if anything the opposite is true. By being an
> > operator itself, the EFF has standing to be involved in the cases
> > themselves, rather than simply providing free legal support to someone
> > else.
> You don't need standing to be counsel to a defendant.
> The rules for standing (in e.g. intervention) are actually pretty
> tricky, and simply being or not being a Tor operator is not necessarily
Thanks for the info and the correction. I was aware that I was
oversimplifying, but perhaps I was oversimplifying a bit too much :).