[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: A different solution for anonymous browsing !

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: A different solution for anonymous browsing !
From: Michael Holstein <michael.holstein@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 10:02:13 -0500
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk@seul.org
Delivery-date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 10:02:58 -0500
In-reply-to: <455FE725.6020707@gmail.com>
References: <455C4B7B.4090305@gabrix.ath.cx> <455FE725.6020707@gmail.com>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060922)

as i have been told (and please correct me if i'm mistaken!), basically, every OS-browser-proxy(-et.al.) combination is going to leave behind a unique footprint that can be tracked by a skilled adversary. the more complicated you make your chain of proxies, the more unique footprint it will leave. in this respect it is best to stick with a configuration more people use, hence anonymity. good luck.


Firefox and "user agent switcher" plugin.

~Mike.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: A different solution for anonymous browsing !
  - From: Seth David Schoen

References:
- A different solution for anonymous browsing !
  - From: gabrix
- Re: A different solution for anonymous browsing !
  - From: Taka Khumbartha

Prev by Author: Re: Anonymous Blogging
Next by Author: Re: Stephen Soghoian on U.S. Gov't Attitudes Toward Tor
Previous by thread: Re: A different solution for anonymous browsing !
Next by thread: Re: A different solution for anonymous browsing !
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread