Hi, > 1: by German law a Tor node admin is something like an access > provider. > You are not responsible for your traffic. If the court have only an IP > address and you have a tor status log, they have nothing. > > 2: Tor is a legal service in Germany (today and yesterday, tomorrow we > will see). If you provided only a legal service, it is no way to > construct a case of aiding and abetting and you are not a > disquieter or > something like that. I know these facts. The problem is that obviously neither the judge nor the public prosecutor knew them. The lesson I learned is that a judge doesn't like to be told that her opinion a) is not logical and b) does not conform to the laws she is bound to. > > 3: May be, there is a judge, who do not these facts. The law > depends not > only on one judge. Dont give up. This might be true, but for me the situation is as follows: Currently I live in this small village called Tuebuingen with a quite clear number of judges and public prosecutors. See, this is the countryside here. It's not like Hamburg, Berlin, Koeln. If you fight here, chances are that you might face a strong opposition. Also, this court (Amtsgericht Tuebingen) is the exact same court that sentenced a student to pay a fine for wearing a crossed-out(!) swastika not so long ago. Details can be found here: <http://www.spiegel.de/unispiegel/wunderbar/0,1518,407112,00.html> (German only). It might have even been the same judge as the article mentions a "Richterin" (female judge) and I suppose there are not that many female judges here in Tuebingen. With these facts in mind, I decided to agree to the paragraph 153 thing. Yes, I might have given up. And I think it will bother me for a long, long time. After the trial was over yesterday I was so disappointed that I considerd quitting my job and moving back to Berlin or at least away from the south. But that would be just an additional punishment for me. > 4: You need help. Try to contact the following organizations: [...] Thanks, but AFAIK there is nothing I can do anymore as a dismissal according to paragaph 153 can't be appealed to. Maybe contacting these organizations before the trial was held could have helped. But my impression was that the people involved were only interested in telling me what a bad person I am and not in serving up justice. I mean, look at the facts: Someone ordered an electronic voucher. This voucher is usually just an email containing some kind of unique database identifier. Why didn't they just contact amazon.de again and asked them where they actually sent the goods that were ordered with this voucher to? And doesn't Web.de here in Germany verify postal addresses of all their freemail customers by sending them a letter containing a code they have to enter in order to activate their email account? So why didn't they ask Web.de for the real address of the person who ordered the voucher? The answer is as sad as it is disappointing: The just didn't care about the case itself. They saw that someone commited a crime, and so someone - be it the right person or not - had to be blamed for it. > By the way (for other admins), it is not a good solution, to > ignore the > first letter. Go to the "visit" and explain, what you have > done and what > you have not done. In my case the police obviously didn't have a clue about what was going on. It would have been so easy to figure out that the IP address amazon.de had in their log files actually belonged to a Tor node. See, I'm not the kind of person that generally distrusts the police, the government, or any authority just because they are an authority. I somehow even like the police - they saved me from trouble lots of years ago. But I don't know if the police officer who asked me to come by would have understood what I could have told him. I'm not sure he would have believed me. So I didn't see any chances of improving the situation for me by talking to the police. However, being the talkative person I happen to be, I was really afraid of talking me into more trouble than I was already in. And this is exactly the reason why the legislator leaves it up to you whether you talk to the police or not. Looking back, it might have been better to talk to the police in the first place. But then again - who knows? Bye, K&K, T-Zee -- |Mirko Thiesen "We're with you all the way, mostly"| |Mirko.Thiesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | http://www.kyb.mpg.de/ | |MPI for Biological Cybernetics | Phone: +49-7071-601-638| |Spemannstr. 38, D-72076 Tuebingen | FAX: +49-7071-601-616|
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature