[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Geode: some more headaches for TorButton? :-P

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Geode: some more headaches for TorButton? :-P
From: phobos@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 07:51:54 -0400
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 09 Oct 2008 07:52:16 -0400
In-reply-to: <48edeeb9.0504c00a.2e2b.ffffeb95@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <48edeeb9.0504c00a.2e2b.ffffeb95@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14)

On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 07:52:10AM -0400, erilenz@xxxxxxxxx wrote 0.8K bytes in 18 lines about:
: Rather than adding to the speculation, I thought I'd actually test the plugin.
: Whenever a site requests your location, your browser asks permission to send it,
: and also allows you to specify how much granularity to provide. You can also
: tick a box to make your browser remember those settings for a particular
: website.

This is acceptable so long as your browser can't be tricked into
thinking you clicked yes with full granularity.  Or that someone can't
remotely read your per site preferences without your knowledge.

-- 
Andrew

References:
- Re: Geode: some more headaches for TorButton? :-P
  - From: Erilenz

Prev by Author: Re: how much does opera leak?
Next by Author: Re: Tor 0.2.0.31-1 in Ubuntu Intrepid Beta - Please Test!
Previous by thread: Re: Geode: some more headaches for TorButton? :-P
Next by thread: Re: Geode: some more headaches for TorButton? :-P
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread