[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Hints and Tips for Whistleblowers - their comments on Tor and SSL - I don't understand.


There is a “Hints and Tips for Whistleblowers Guide” available at http://ht4w.co.uk/.

The section on proxies includes Tor-related information which I fail to understand:

"You may actually get more anonymity when using the Tor cloud by not using the https:// version of a web page (if there is an alternative, unencrypted version available), since all the Tor traffic is encrypted anyway between your PC and the final exit node in the Tor cloud, which will probably not be physically in the United Kingdom."

---I have no idea what this means. I thought the whole point of using https:// was to prevent Tor exit nodes from snooping and / or potentially injecting content.

"This applies especially to websites like the reasonably anonymous whistleblowing website wikileaks.org (based in Sweden) , which offer both http://, https:/and Tor Hidden Service methods of uploading whistleblower leak documents, but who tend to, mistakenly, insist on using https:// encryption for when someone comments on their wiki discussion pages. When (not if) the wikileaks.org servers, or a blog or a discussion forum like the activist news site Indymedia UK are physically seized (this happened to IndyMedia UK at least 3 times now) , this may, in some circumstances, betray the real IP addresses of commentators with inside knowledge of a whistleblower leak i.e. suspects for a leak investigation."

-----How on earth can it be “mistaken” to insist on using https:// encryption?  Why would using https:// "betray the real IP addresses"?