[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-talk] GoodBadISPs revamp?

To: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] GoodBadISPs revamp?
From: Thomas White <thomaswhite@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 02:03:23 +0100
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sun, 12 Oct 2014 21:03:41 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1413162210; bh=CS1SQceS2NHBqQM7sCN6xB+FItw6MdgUlM/UgSJ49G8=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=clqkENf/dKbMBeNTIHYnkJ8hq1Auctskb95vJFsrFxDemfulbU4B+ZWtbdmtWC9OH yMR2oGECqbdCpP0faSz+Tm8cAcHN1bjVKTJlCXQH7BH+eG/MpFr4bjtmHopm5tvbtN D/+8HrJ72fV45uCREA9eIdZSf9lkgL5/N3h2AVMw=
In-reply-to: <9c75bcd857735052022e6c6594245178.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "all discussion about theory, design, and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <9c75bcd857735052022e6c6594245178.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Keep the conversation on [tor-relays] so anyone who wants to
participate please reply on that side (cross posting is fine to let
people know but I feel it's best kept to relay operators since they
are the ones who are probably most knowledgeable about it).

- -T

On 13/10/2014 01:56, subkeys@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> [cross-posted on tor-talk and tor-relays]
> 
> i've found that the Tor GoodBadISPs list [1] is somewhat outdated
> on current hosts that allow Tor (exit) relays to be hosted. i'm
> trying to find a cheap host that allows exits to be operated from
> their services, and navigating the outdated list and finding an
> operator that isn't extremely expensive is time consuming (some
> entries go back to 2010!).
> 
> should the community start a revamp project (or start a whole new
> list)? i'd be willing to donate my time to help get this started if
> need be.
> 
> thanks. ---- mikael ball 0xB1910271AE8587F4 @subkeys
> 
> [1]: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/GoodBadISPs
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
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=IXEG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

References:
- [tor-talk] GoodBadISPs revamp?
  - From: subkeys

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-talk] Another Tor is Possible, Kane/Ksec
Next by Author: Re: [tor-talk] monitoring tor relay traffic
Previous by thread: [tor-talk] GoodBadISPs revamp?
Next by thread: Re: [tor-talk] [tor-relays] GoodBadISPs revamp?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread