[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: I break the silence: My arrest
- To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: I break the silence: My arrest
- From: "Ringo Kamens" <2600denver@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 09:06:25 -0400
- Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 09:06:34 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=OPp8tBZBgXGxsbdhqOKM3Ky5IHJelRNYn9mBAB1a7Yc=; b=ggiaCqTJyNmI212f4ftrLriNkxUalAIlu5iEWd2kj12aus9U02/id1iwzYrMHNKF9YG619KNq/g+bDx2mRwQgnnDPUyuHlV/BmnYNhRLigVzRgHeBtKi1UWOsczNb905cYXOGJSdtvSsnwVXEeAYxzp3HxSLL/tduZ/UHqJ9Ffo=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Pdmq0u/v7n5O/c6w2lm+s7mKQehjUuXrD1gWDuovVzDOnXq65VTO0p5wHKPcFS9mNBZzFKG3cjj7YZccx4LbGOJNjpISxQoaI1hHTvbH+qDuG85Ns5r11iojKfgupwwuQaMPc1IeqZ1/HNNkeLw1r97z791Reh9R6yWVW/UvZfs=
- In-reply-to: <200709161216.l8GCGAt2004607@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <200709161216.l8GCGAt2004607@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
I know they aren't directly related, but it could also help to involve
*the unions* because they have a lot of power. At least in the US.
Unfortunately I just started school and I have very little time on my
hands so I can't directly help with this project much, even though I
was working 10 hours a day with them before, but you should make a
post to Binary Freedom (the discussion list). People there will
certainly help you. They are an advocacy group for binary freedoms
that participate in a lot of direct action and they can certainly help
your cause. We have troops on the ground in the UK, but not sure about
Germany.
Comrade Ringo Kamens
On 9/16/07, Scott Bennett <bennett@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 12:08:27 +0200 Thomas Hluchnik
> <Thomas.Hluchnik@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >Am Sonntag, 16. September 2007 07:41 schrieb Martin Senftleben:
> >
> >Hello,
>
> Please get with the program. This is getting to be a real drag. See
> below.
> >
> >can you please give some more info about that? I am just thinkinking about=
> >=20
> >becoming member of a association and let my two tor nodes register as from=
> >=20
> >that association. I have the luck that my home was not yet searched by any=
> >=20
> >technical incompetent police, but who knows...
> >
> >What about the "Humanistische Union"? Do they have tor nodes? Is there anyb=
> >ody=20
> >of them in this thread? Would like to hear if the HU is interested of getti=
> >mg=20
> >members with tor nodes as entrance gift.
> >
> >What I definitely NOT like is giving up my help for the tor project. In tim=
> >es=20
> >like these modern inquisition we have to resist, but have to find ways to=20
> >protect ourselves.
> >
> >
> >> I am currently into registering an association that was founded more=20
> >> than a hundred years ago - that is quite some work, but manageable.=20
> >> I find the thought to found an association quite intriguing,=20
> >> particularly for Germany, where the members of a registered=20
> >> association (eingetragener Verein) would be protected against legal=20
> >> prosecution. The association could act as contract partners with the=20
> >> ISPs, and as that run Tor nodes which are managed by its members.=20
> >>=20
> >> BTW, one such node has just been set up which is legally registered=20
> >> with an association in Germany and run by a previous Tor-node admin=20
> >> who has also been harassed by the police. But I don't think they will=20
> >> be setting up more nodes.
>
> A: It makes it hard to follow and is thus inconsiderate.
> B: >Why not?
> A>> Once again, Do NOT TOP-POST!!!
>
>
> Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
> **********************************************************************
> * Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu *
> *--------------------------------------------------------------------*
> * "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good *
> * objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments *
> * -- a standing army." *
> * -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 *
> **********************************************************************
>