[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: I break the silence: My arrest

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: I break the silence: My arrest
From: Smuggler <smuggler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 20:38:45 +0100
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 15:38:53 -0400
In-reply-to: <1189901992.10458.20.camel@satyr>
References: <bb1289090709151517l955298cnd9e57da9a09b482f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1189901992.10458.20.camel@satyr>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.13 (X11/20070824)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Ricky,

Ricky Fitz wrote:

> I think there is a need to incorporate. If there is for example an
> incorporated society which runs some tor-nodes, police is going to
> confiscate the servers (which is okay), but not going to search houses
> from members of the incorporated society.

I know from personal experience that this is not necessarily true.
We had an IP under investigation. The RIPE entry showed it to be
operated by a corporation. All contracts (uplink, cage, etc.) were made
by the corporation.
That didnt stop the police to search my personal apartment (not the
corporate offices).

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFG7YZEOMmnRrmEoQkRAqLNAJwLlBk0Mdhd+PuVgr7fb4aNrlmtYgCgl0iy
ASFH/+8sbBn6epBtvBRi+Mg=
=rOBy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- I break the silence: My arrest
  - From: Alexander W. Janssen
- Re: I break the silence: My arrest
  - From: Ricky Fitz

Prev by Author: Re: [Fwd: Re: I break the silence: My arrest]
Next by Author: How-To Torify full TCP Host connection / full TCP subnet connection
Previous by thread: Re: I break the silence: My arrest
Next by thread: Re: I break the silence: My arrest
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread