Juliusz Chroboczek <Juliusz.Chroboczek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I believe this results in a perceptible performance improvement for general > > browsing. > > I think so too, but some people disagree. Since I don't want to get > into this discussion again, I refer you to the following friendly flamewar. Additionally there's http://tor.eff.org/volunteer.html.en#Coding: |We need a measurement study of Polipo vs Privoxy. Is Polipo in |fact significantly faster, once you factor in the slow-down from Tor? |Are the results the same on both Linux and Windows? Related, does Polipo |handle more web sites correctly than Privoxy, or vice versa? Are there |stability issues on any common platforms, e.g. Windows? Looks like the first person who comes up with a reproducible benchmark could make three projects happy at the same time. > (Note that while the tone was not always as polite as it should have > been, Fabian and I live in good friendship and mutual respect.) I second that. Fabian
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature