[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Advanced traffic shaping with iptables?

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Advanced traffic shaping with iptables?
From: Eugen Leitl <eugen@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 09:05:17 +0200
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 03:05:28 -0400
In-reply-to: <000301c7ff19$69d8ce30$3d8a6a90$@org>
References: <46F8572C.8020500@xxxxxxxx> <000301c7ff19$69d8ce30$3d8a6a90$@org>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)

On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 07:41:27AM +0530, Strykar wrote:

> Burst bandwidth wouldn't hurt the network.
> 
> If you want bandwidth shaping, I'd suggest using pf (Open/FreeBSD) for
> traffic shaping.
> iptables + tc never did the job for me and it's the reason I tried pf in the
> first place.
> 
> Pf has incredibly legible syntax and reading the pf faq will get you up and
> running in no time.

You don't even have to read the syntax if you use pfSense. It does
come with a traffic shaper. You might have trouble buying WRAP
boards, but ALIX will be there any time now.

-- 
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org";>leitl</a> http://leitl.org
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A  7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE

References:
- Advanced traffic shaping with iptables?
  - From: Linus Lüssing
- RE: Advanced traffic shaping with iptables?
  - From: Strykar

Prev by Author: Re: Has anyone had the identity revealed in Tor?
Next by Author: Re: Set up a webproxy to TOR - tor-proxy.net
Previous by thread: RE: Advanced traffic shaping with iptables?
Next by thread: Re: Advanced traffic shaping with iptables?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread