[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why you need balls of steel to operate a Tor exit node
- To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Why you need balls of steel to operate a Tor exit node
- From: grarpamp <grarpamp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 05:04:13 -0400
- Cc: tor-relays@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 05:04:17 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=11Y/zMu4Iz4hh71GnMk7G035eAtL1UH/FTW2kJSnFsc=; b=lHYs5Bk3wAdckMr6XqIdm9+kLcNkCQvkcvtteLT3NBcB8tLJKhk4OSOWhY54qMD2ee /Ifhs+Qe+RHmTf2YI8K1Isaj/aELIM4PcTo6PhilYcnH6Ycjyxdyr79X6XFYea5JDNds Y9ghlVJvpFIMSC2cfabxZmfcLF0Pe0E3TY7Mw=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=YJ0BuNoHnRzxQGY6CnSlGFO+2KX58vBDziBTNanGGFwt0ylhRqgwEwVqbCLUdO1rbI pYLdKXUYerLUqhLPCrpU5OrEk7sizhPZNXrLWVTjM8gj24vDntOx8jqK/LacnBDNIJyT juWfLicB83OlucBShRNfcgUwwIfJfGJtgHHxc=
- In-reply-to: <20090909200916.GF9828@xxxxxxxxx>
- References: <20090909200916.GF9828@xxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
The tor-relays list could be used for this sort of thing.
Posting actual complaints received, what you sent back, the results, etc.
I don't see any reason not to post them.
Anonymized/summarized as needed of course if you care about that.
Operators and potential operators need to review these sorts of
things to make their own decisions.