> I really don't understand why you are particularly so upset with > PinkMeth. People's information is being exploited all over, with and > without tor. What about facebook, or gmail, or yahoo selling your > information to advertisers? There can be very intimate info, textual > or graphical, there. I am sure advertisers routinely get dumps with > nudes included as parts of the customer profiles by well known > companies under NDA. How is this better than PinkMeth? Is it because > this is done in secret, and isn't obvious? You sound like a troll but I'll feed you with something to think about on the off-chance that you are actually serious. a) Can you opt-out of Facebook, GMail and Yahoo? b) Do you yourself have to take any active action to get on Facebook, GMail and Yahoo? c) Can you opt-out of PinkMeth? There really is a huge difference. I do not have a Facebook account and I only use GMail to ask idiots who send me e-mail from Hotmail for an alternative address (since Hotmail has blocked my mailserver since forever). This is my choice. I can not prevent people I know from posting pictures of me on Facebook but if someone does that then it will likely be posted under their real name and I can ask them to remove it. I would have to register a Facebook account to get on there, and that would be my choice. If I post a picture of my ex-gf on PinkMeth then that is NOT her choice and it is not that easy for her to remove it (or even find out about it). There is a big difference between sites abusing the data you give them if you are stupid enough to give them any and sites where other people post your data without your knowledge or concent.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk