[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-talk] Fwd: IP Banned for running a non-exit relay from home?




On 9/30/2014 7:27 PM, stn wrote:
some weeks ago i asked daniel why he blocked tor traffic.  he sited SSH brute force, smtp and other abuse issues.  he's a sysadmin so i can understand the need to protect his networks.

thanks for brining in a higher resolution view here.

hope your approach works or at least opens the door to communication with him.
he maintains a tor  list updated every 30 minutes so maybe addressing his specific concerns can help ?  i'd hate to see others blindly block from his lists.

he was polite and answered some basic networking questions about netBSD for me and that was about it.  he didn't answer me immediately either.  so straight to /dev/null ... not in my case at least.

he also doens't like anonymous proxies generally by the notice his site gives when attempting  to connect with tor if i've read it correctly.
Since a lot of sites need / want to make money off of advertising, it will surprise me if more sites don't start blocking Tor - for economic reasons. Probably "targeted advertising" - where the more info they have about you, your location, individual browser & system characteristics - the more that ad companies are willing to pay. I imagine that advertisers don't consider TBB users as very "targeted" (where we're all *supposed* to look like each other) & they have no IPa, no geo location - not much of anything, really.

Some site owners are also "sharing" their registered users info, according to articles by various outlets - Wall St. Journal, being one. Or, they just let the tracking / data gather companies put trackers on their site, then allow trackers to gather the data.

Sometimes a site may share only meta data & according to several articles I've seen, including direct comments or quotes from the "data mining" companies employees, they eventually want to be able to tie a person's browser / computer online with a real name & physical address & email address, along w/ any other interests, associations they can dig up. I DON'T know what this Daniel guy is / isn't doing - maybe nothing "wrong." But, you can apply the general data gathering, ad delivering, revenue generating process to other sites & see why some of them don't want any anonymous users - Tor or other.

Tor / TBB doesn't exactly lend itself to that business model. Maybe some have heard, gathering personal data on internet users is now big business. No? Tor thwarts that objective. The trackers (who pay many site owners) say, "We don't need no stinking Tor Browsers."






On Sep 30, 2014, at 7:07 PM, Michael Wolf wrote:

On 9/30/2014 2:26 AM, Virgil Griffith wrote:
Perhaps weirdly, this fellow does seem to know what he is doing.

On page, https://www.dan.me.uk/dnsbl

He explicitly offers a different list for blocking just exits.  The
only thing I can think of is to email a request that he block just
exists instead of overblocking all Tor nodes.

-V

I sent a polite email to this individual several months ago regarding
this exact issue.  The email was ignored.  The following was sent the
email address listed on his site (me AT dan DOT me DOT uk):


Dear Daniel,

I noticed that your site blocks non-exit tor relays -- for example, my
own IP of 107.197.196.79.  As a fellow admin, I respect your right to
block anything you want.  However, I kindly request that you limit your
block to only exit relays.  There are may people around the world who
run middle relays from home, and it seems to serve no purpose to punish
them for trying to help other people

Along those lines, if you would consider adding some warning or
explanation to the .tor.dan.me.uk blacklist (or even mentioning that it
shouldn't be used as a blacklist), it would be much appreciated.
Well-intentioned users around the world are being blocked from various
forums, retail sites, and government websites, despite never having
broken any rules.

Thank you for your time.


Sincerely,

Michael Wolf
Perhaps enough similar emails will persuade him?  Or perhaps he
/dev/null's anything with "tor" in it?

-- Mike
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk