Re: more time, 0.1.2 released

[Peter Burns <pcburns@zipworld.com.au>]

Christian Reiniger wrote:
> 
> What do you think - should we open a new "0.2" branch for these greater
> changes and try to make 0.1 as stable as possible or should we just code on
> in 0.1?
 
Yes that is a good idea. It doesn't really matter what you call the
branches. Just make sure that people know that one branch may not be
compatible with the other.

> Another thing: I'm hunting down warnings a bit, and ...
> (1) I fixed the "member initializers will be reordered" one in Sample.h
>     (just swapping a few lines)
> (2) The PSound Makefile.am messes with the compiler flags, overriding
> things set by the user (predefined CXXFLAGS) and configure (optimization,
> no debugging for release builds):
> 
> ----------
> DEF_FLAGS            =  -DNO_MIXER_THREAD
> DEBUG_FLAGS          = -g $(DEF_FLAGS)
> # PenguinSound includes, PenguinPlay includes
> CXXFLAGS             = -D_REENTRANT $(PROFILE_FLAGS) $(DEBUG_FLAGS)
> ----------
> 
> What about changing that to simply:
> 
> -----------
> CXXFLAGS = $(CXXFLAGS) -D_REENTRANT -DNO_MIXER_THREAD
> -----------
> 
> ?

Yes that is ok.

Peter Burns

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: penguinplay-unsubscribe@sunsite.auc.dk
For additional commands, e-mail: penguinplay-help@sunsite.auc.dk