[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
[pygame] Python 3.0 to be backwards incompatible ?
- To: pygame-users@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: [pygame] Python 3.0 to be backwards incompatible ?
- From: "Paulo Silva" <nitrofurano@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:32:52 +0100
- Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: pygame-users-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: pygame-users@xxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:32:57 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=rkULrlUvrEWPB+Vx1s0r3c45AD0ghyyv0zByEdQ9mqk=; b=nWg0PM3JzcnRkQ+p29xcM9HMnTTeSvNGO4yPkEMGe+hS+6eZysGG86qIVajesdZXIr BIezmavfo7UYfr9bk/DjVxv5EqNrUqcBSPQLGyqVX6+utOvMHXQlWDUxjM2ns1HotoBb xIC8EQk6TnnsDNTQfgK8WBvkXYZz76nihKZzE=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=cUNsVanJHJ0ljkH3zqWbKq+y1HxjuCG+tKNZLV5iCkOCYLEz8maGFLqjMYXB/gPPAT Q6yeSeDd6fJa2T0t39xa9BlOJp72t+YwhcwtGWLpxDGv/rTsbytjkliH8WgBjwK53Xcv S4sGrYTGFN2kmK/7PJ4wx41fucnouz6YNs5X0=
- Reply-to: pygame-users@xxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-pygame-users@xxxxxxxx
http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/02/01/1624247
well, this sounds to me as a huge headache... but i'd like to know
oppinions about (what will be improved, what will be changed),
specially all Pygame coders, and how far it may affect Pygame games
supposed to be 'considered' done...