Re: [pygame] Python 3.0 to be backwards incompatible ?

To: pygame-users@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [pygame] Python 3.0 to be backwards incompatible ?
From: "Ian Mallett" <geometrian@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:44:21 -0700
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pygame-users-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pygame-users@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:44:25 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=4NpZhi/nLwHavUkDknXoEwphA9n7t1Hv+YCHWOjRKJQ=; b=K/XeHEljsG1i5+jKy0ySlcB7CZicDLP8R0vPVDpK7i3kl1D7hfptE9TtcosAeCVyN5 jKARP44V5hilcKAmHTovy7wws2H2jHdHZ0HFbrCqYPp7vY/3ymOP9y3veCSK50XGgbLK kTUtSkbDa9C838+T0QC3e985cmJQ4xLHGMBbM=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=AjtjerH+vyPPgrNhz0ZouoLhF2x699htV2AHNOoA2oX4u/iiT3lqTrEyeJITxuRFb0 uKGW0oFPnwGk39CNIQ8AP/s7xOkYmYdcAzmeRXJ8uddKbZkTNPL/KujakXTYsAmlKrCO p4sTSum4awgQRpTHXTYUAsv9WwbeFyexErrE4=
In-reply-to: <410379E3-5E22-4AF3-8A6C-43A7308B6C13@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <9b711ec60807311332s18e6469cl7cf73a04332b8f28@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <48924547.4050904@xxxxxxxxx> <9b711ec60807311640o24204cffyc0ee48c95bfc003d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <410379E3-5E22-4AF3-8A6C-43A7308B6C13@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: pygame-users@xxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-pygame-users@xxxxxxxx

I understand the difference between float and integer division, my point was that being forced to doing it the long way above is bad.
Ian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [pygame] Python 3.0 to be backwards incompatible ?
  - From: Casey Duncan

References:
- [pygame] Python 3.0 to be backwards incompatible ?
  - From: Paulo Silva
- Re: [pygame] Python 3.0 to be backwards incompatible ?
  - From: Lenard Lindstrom
- Re: [pygame] Python 3.0 to be backwards incompatible ?
  - From: Paulo Silva
- Re: [pygame] Python 3.0 to be backwards incompatible ?
  - From: Casey Duncan