[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: FW: [school-discuss] Operational Questions (was Updated Coalition Procedures - Members sign up here)
- To: schoolforge-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: FW: [school-discuss] Operational Questions (was Updated Coalition Procedures - Members sign up here)
- From: Teprine Baldo <teprine76@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:06:08 -0500 (EST)
- Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
- Delivered-to: schoolforge-discuss-outgoing@seul.org
- Delivered-to: schoolforge-discuss@seul.org
- Delivery-date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:06:44 -0500
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.ca; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=JIao7AWu4qnvuy1ZNylc8II0+4/+AggIRHjzw4dcfV5QWoCJDYMKdFs1uBbqqbGiZVMlTm7AEWX0pDrXt8cpQP3voj6SQhdZVDvnc2RRBg8eUL+OfleyXcNiXqP2DobUH7u7vHrLVcVZI/AH3GH+wfwPK/is0O/B4PuyrD+SGFk=;
- In-reply-to: <005c01c7564e$d46cb3c0$6701a8c0@saturn>
- Reply-to: schoolforge-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-schoolforge-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hello Michael,
I don't answer because I don't have the answers.
Sorry.
Teprine Baldo
--- Michael Viron <mviron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Justin,
>
> I am becoming increasingly frustrated with the
> continued lack of response to
> these important operational issues which need to be
> addressed. It has now
> been over 2 months since my original post of
> December 15th, 2006 (with
> subsequent posts on this same subject on December
> 31st, January 16th,
> January 28th, and February 8th) with no response
> forthcoming. Please
> provide a response to the questions below at your
> earliest possible
> convenience.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Michael Viron
> President & CEO
> General Education Online
>
> _____
>
> From: owner-schoolforge-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-schoolforge-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Michael
> Viron
> Sent: Sunday, December 31, 2006 11:32 AM
> To: schoolforge-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: FW: [school-discuss] Updated Coalition
> Procedures - Members sign up
> here
>
>
> Justin,
>
> In your latest email, you still have not addressed
> my earlier concerns
> mentioned on December 15th, specifically the
> following:
>
> 1) Who decides to close a current members standing
> in the Schoolforge
> Coalition?
> 2) Why are previous active members of Schoolforge
> now having to "re-apply"
> for membership?
> 3) What are the procedures to close / revoke an
> organizations membership?
> How is the organization notified? Is there a
> possibility of appeal?
>
> Thank you for your time,
>
> Michael Viron
> President & CEO
> General Education Online, A Schoolforge Founding
> Member
> International Education Resources, A General
> Education Online organization
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: owner-schoolforge-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-schoolforge-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Justin
> Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 8:37 AM
> To: schoolforge-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [school-discuss] Updated Coalition
> Procedures - Members sign up
> here
>
>
> Michael, these are good questions.
>
> "I must again mention something regarding the narrow
> definition of "FLOSS"
> on the website which seems to indicate that "free /
> open resources" are not
> welcome as members of schoolforge. This is in
> direct contradiction to the
> founding principles which allowed for those projects
> that provide web-based
> open resources which may or may not include
> providing a copy of the
> underlying "software" that powers the site."
>
> Actually, there are no contradictions to the
> founding principles in this
> definition. Over the years since the founding
> principles were laid out, the
> 'web services' landscape has made enough ground that
> we can start to see
> what utilities share our view of free and open, and
> can be used to create
> even better resources in the future. A site such as
> Wikipedia, for example,
> serves as an example of a 'web service' that is free
> and open - and
> facilitates the principles of unity and resource
> building through
> collaboration that SchoolForge was founded on.
>
> Free (cost wise) resources are a great thing, but
> using that along with
> SchoolForge principles seems flawed. An example
> could be that Mac offered
> to provide their operating system free to the OLPC
> project for free, which
> was turned down on the basis that it's not open
> source. I think Microsoft
> has offered their OS for free to schools that were
> going with open source
> alternatives. In both of these cases, it's the
> licensing of the open source
> tools that has prompted a response of lower
> costs/free resources.
>
> As for SchoolForge Coalition membership, for now
> your entries are rejected.
> I think what you provide are wonderful resources,
> and I invite you to
> resubmit your request when your resources can be
> accessed without any
> question as to whether they meet the definition of
> "FLOSS" as provided on
> the website. I'm willing to work with you towards
> reaching that, but if
> that isn't the direction you want to go - please
> make this point clear.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
>
Teprine Baldo
Bleu Rouge Productions
(514) 201-7801
(514) 522-3168
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com