On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 03:00, Michael Shigorin <mike@xxxxxxxxxxx>
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 07:20:07PM +0700, j. Tim Denny wrote:Noes, usbflash is pretty inferior in terms of performance.
> how about buying a 16gb USB flash drive to run your OS...
Part of the problem is USB, just compare an external HDD
being plugged via (e)SATA/IEEE1394 to the same one but
plugged via USB2 (didn't look at USB3 cages yet).
I have not been so lucky to try any of the high performance USB sticks.. Â I usually just buy the cheapest one... Â In looking at the read write benchmarks of some USB sticks it sure seems to me they are up there... Â
My two 128Gb SSDs are worth every penny of ~$540 I paid for them
> of course an SSD would be more fun... but they remain expensive
> for the time being.
but that's probably another case...
nice... but way out of our price range in Laos.Â
Nice thin clients, just in case. ÂA single dualcore or quadcore
> I am thinking of going that way for 5-10 older model computers
> at a university in Laos... Âthe current hard drives are in the
> 20-40gb range I think nearly 10 years old... ÂPIII cpus and
> 128mb ram.
system with 2..4Gb RAM (and ideally, two SATA drives in RAID1)
would make them all feel much more modern. ÂDid you consider
some LTSP based distros? (there was a Thinstation 5.0 release
announcement recently but I didn't mess with it yet)
too complex for the staff to maintain.. Âthey currently have one Ncomputing setup and it causing troubles.Â
USB flash isn't going help those really much but an extra stick
of 64..256M SDRAM would go much further (given some lightweight
distro and a desire to run things locally).
the problem is difficulty in sourcing older RAM and of course the high price...
Â---- WBR, Michael Shigorin <mike@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Â------ Linux.Kiev http://www.linux.kiev.ua/
To unsubscribe from the schoolforge-discuss mailing list:
Send an e-mail message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with no subject
and a body of "unsubscribe schoolforge-discuss"