[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[seul-edu] Re: ISO project--a different approach

To: seul-edu@seul.org
Subject: [seul-edu] Re: ISO project--a different approach
From: Michael Shigorin <mike@osdn.org.ua>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 20:36:34 +0300
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: seul-edu-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-To: seul-edu@seul.org
Delivery-Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 13:36:44 -0400
In-Reply-To: <3DA465C3.9CED362B@suscom.net>
Mail-Followup-To: seul-edu@seul.org
References: <3DA465C3.9CED362B@suscom.net>
Reply-To: seul-edu@seul.org
Sender: owner-seul-edu@seul.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i

On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 01:22:11PM -0400, Doug Loss wrote:
> At the same time, we can have people doing research for an
> installer (Phase 4).  This is probably the part that will be
> the most fun for some of us Linux geeks.

...or better yet, considering joining Debian Jr with this
subproject. :-)

Installers are no fun as soon as you try come closer to
real-world usability, and the only noncommercial effort that
really strives is exactly Debian.  Either that, or RH K12 -- "yet
another distro" is probably just too much dissipation.

-- 
 ---- WBR, Michael Shigorin <mike@altlinux.ru>
  ------ Linux.Kiev http://www.linux.kiev.ua/

PGP signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [seul-edu] Re: ISO project--a different approach
  - From: Doug Loss <drloss@suscom.net>

References:
- [seul-edu] ISO project--a different approach
  - From: Doug Loss <drloss@suscom.net>

Prev by Date: [seul-edu] ISO project--a different approach
Next by Date: Re: [seul-edu] Re: ISO project--a different approach
Prev by thread: [seul-edu] ISO project--a different approach
Next by thread: Re: [seul-edu] Re: ISO project--a different approach
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread