[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SEUL: Re: Installation script
On Tue, 7 Oct 1997, Luka wrote:
> well, sort of. the way to build an rpm at least (i don't know about dpkg yet)
> is pretty conducive to including the right dependencies if you think about it
> when you're building the rpm. it is trivially possible to ignore it though.
It appears, from my work trying to create symlink-only packages (so you
can install it on a lightweight client, keeping the actual files on an
NFS/SMB server), that rpm actually goes around looking at binaries,
running ldd on them, and includes those deps. I'll have to try to verify
> we should give this some thought, so anyone with some clever insights....?
I was scanning through the rpm change logs and found mention of specific
semantics for dependencies. If it starts with a '/', it's assumed to be a
file. Otherwise it's assumed to be a library. But there are packages
that require other packages, so I don't know how they decide what's a
library dep and what's a package dep. Something to be researched.
Erik Walthinsen - Programmer, webmaster, 3D artist, etc. __
__ / /\
/ \ firstname.lastname@example.org Work: (503)578-5314 / / \
| | M E G A email@example.com Home: (503)281-4281 / / /\ \
_\ /_ firstname.lastname@example.org Majoring in CS / / /\ \ \
/ /_/__\ \ \
Omega Station: http://www.aracnet.com/~omega/ /________\ \ \
Info on Linux, Graphics, Descent, Laptops, etc. \___________\/