[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Proposal: New PROTOCOLINFO command for controllers

To: or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Proposal: New PROTOCOLINFO command for controllers
From: coderman <coderman@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 21:11:45 -0700
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-dev-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-dev@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 00:11:58 -0400
Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=IFs0oavRGak/TN3DkQtddDsHrb3Bmp1i+ppmj1MCHljOllrR7CRXJtZn9tDBMI0ytm4Dr9Y6VEnaeV/wKVWhMGGvP1KlvfsCIVGvjs3j7wJTqEOWa5nSPcpWs/QLYdZVBk5L/2F9d834OyErsriirsm2yWpov84eawVx9rc7ioY=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=B7cXGXbwkvO/NectwVIM/5BngoAxc+l3VRVWpcKQ4bLUbTGuZWq6rvkL94MjV6lMswUnFavt6+yYImRPLSio42QKxkuEpa4mQuCn950Mz1CBGVBi0Q8BptURfBVEZPm5FuJQaoyUbsV3A7UeStMXRgsGad16f59Rqstj5Y+8JgU=
In-reply-to: <20070814234504.E34125@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20070814173044.GB21967@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070814182941.GO19544@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070814234504.E34125@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

On 8/14/07, Cat Okita <cat@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ...
> > What happens if the second command is _not_ authenticate or quit?  I'd
> > suggest, "Tor closes the connection."
>
> What happens if there never is a second command?...
> could be "interesting".

Tor waits patiently... very patiently.  not too interesting, although
this behavior could be used to consume socket descriptors.  a timeout
(minutes?) might be useful.

best regards,

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Proposal: New PROTOCOLINFO command for controllers
  - From: Cat Okita

References:
- Proposal: New PROTOCOLINFO command for controllers
  - From: Roger Dingledine
- Re: Proposal: New PROTOCOLINFO command for controllers
  - From: Nick Mathewson
- Re: Proposal: New PROTOCOLINFO command for controllers
  - From: Cat Okita

Prev by Author: Problems compiling Tor with an altered libevent.
Next by Author: Re: Server node stalls on unsuccessful socks listener change
Previous by thread: Re: Proposal: New PROTOCOLINFO command for controllers
Next by thread: Re: Proposal: New PROTOCOLINFO command for controllers
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread