[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] Uptime missing from Arm

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Uptime missing from Arm
From: Damian Johnson <atagar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 10:46:42 -0800
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 13:46:56 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=S3qeVdA5IeyMeskRD95XiEeWWXDnm30YdzhrNiWHIwE=; b=NCETfTvOzZ+sjxNZoNejF1zqXbN1dd56Kx75m7PtIluyVWLsSpbR++ZNh45Y+lOwfG abqfxiIRjj6nRIHwAs40hjyw2L616oJFTueCU8kAWyNrsAaDDyAlCVOEK94AHOa4gJ6u pvVRb8Zouypg+LS+7UxCes1MnQNNoKSoVLdFkwNvEKBHqTlkT01R6uwriePAQhJKH8y6 0QSER89XLXqxi8FlEGEsAo2LBKqEeX2XPi+w264qiQ6LijKGfhDekXupww7XIx+e1cia 8lSWwJWkB+pAhN8aF9kiC2ZSbeNvHnXdJg0p65ZWYXKMW8TBLoZX7KSvS+Wg95fdg4rp BLSA==
In-reply-to: <1483904526.11406.1.camel@simonfischer.info>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <ce2e9de03229afa02a3fd5d425ed0582.squirrel@clutterbuck.uk> <CAJdkzENAyUh79MJzQwT-g31Y9ZNxi4akt1wA3HhAM2SLQePyig@mail.gmail.com> <1483904526.11406.1.camel@simonfischer.info>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-relays" <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> arm does not show uptime and the average bandwidth rate is way to high.

This is because tor changed the format of its state file since arm's
last release, causing the prepopulated values to be inaccurate. The
current codebase (nyx) uses a new capability of tor's control port to
provide much better graph prepopulation as you already observed.
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

References:
- [tor-relays] Uptime missing from Arm
  - From: Alan
- Re: [tor-relays] Uptime missing from Arm
  - From: Damian Johnson
- Re: [tor-relays] Uptime missing from Arm
  - From: Simon Fischer

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-relays] Uptime missing from Arm
Next by Author: Re: [tor-relays] FW: What's a "useful" mailing list contributor? (was Re: What's a "useful" relay?)
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-relays] Uptime missing from Arm
Next by thread: Re: [tor-relays] Uptime missing from Arm
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread