[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] Call for discussion: turning funding into more exit relays




On 07/30/2012 11:53 AM, Moritz Bartl wrote:
On 30.07.2012 13:27, Moritz Bartl wrote:
We have been kicked from FDC in the past

With only port 80, 443, 554, and 1755 open, this might be different and
worth a try. Same goes for the similar offer for shared 10 Gbps by Limehost.


It wouldn't be different. FDC threatened to cancel my account after several complaints of spamming via webmail. (I was using the Reduced Exit Policy found on Tor's website.) They only backed down after I changed my exit node into a middle node.

Allowing exits from ports 80 and 443 will always carry the risk of abuse complaints.

It would be better to retain 80 and 443 as exit ports and just block traffic to the Google/Yahoo/AOL/etc. mail servers but I don't how that could be done with their respective load-balancing schemes.
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays