[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] Is Kaspersky right to be concerned?

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Is Kaspersky right to be concerned?
From: krishna e bera <keb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 08:32:31 -0400
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 08:32:48 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cyblings.on.ca; s=google; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pJxBLhrN9RSxFCPaDJgMcDBerQpR/bO+hWn8GUpmsYk=; b=Cnrcu2xDyKq523qrqtypd48iN9ts7bgjEJmvOMOqI7W3hz5qlznOR8RTddeztI3qXx W2h5LrR5OkF2y3ATjmisW97OdVk/MJCNE0pnC+qHaeutNdTK64vZw8vKcOweGBQwBRRQ DKnD/QZUVVYxgvl7icGrFkE6UBIaxVxQeMUe0=
In-reply-to: <201403091617.55321.r.a@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <cad2ti2-g6gvmmkisg+x1tbftcxwa8wmwm5f=hewbfakmzxiitq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <90778534EEF.0000054Dbeatthebastards@xxxxxxxxx> <20140309130239.GA30502@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <201403091617.55321.r.a@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-relays" <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0

On 14-03-09 11:17 AM, ra wrote:
> ...I think one has to distinguish between 
> Tor and Tor hidden services. While Tor has it's socially laudable 
> applications, the vast majority of Tor hidden service usage are in fact not. 

Could you cite some references for this statistic?

_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-relays] Is Kaspersky right to be concerned?
  - From: ra

References:
- [tor-relays] Is Kaspersky right to be concerned?
  - From: I
- Re: [tor-relays] Is Kaspersky right to be concerned?
  - From: Andrew Lewman
- Re: [tor-relays] Is Kaspersky right to be concerned?
  - From: ra

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-relays] Port 8118 Traffic?
Next by Author: Re: [tor-relays] Relay configuration for FreedomBox
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-relays] Is Kaspersky right to be concerned?
Next by thread: Re: [tor-relays] Is Kaspersky right to be concerned?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread