Re: gEDA-user: gEDA vs commercial product

[Peter Clifton <pcjc2@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 08:25 +0200, L.J.H. Timmerman wrote:

> If yes, and if a following naming scheme like "04-04-01.sym" would be
> used (obfuscated symbol name for a resistor as used in the Dutch
> standard NEN 5152:2004, which is derived from or conforming to the IEC
> 60617 standard) there would be a "description" field needed in the
> symbol and in the chooser dialog to make clear what the symbol is
> suppose to represent.  

http://www2.nen.nl/nen/servlet/dispatcher.Dispatcher?id=BIBLIOGRAFISCHEGEGEVENS&contentID=182734

I can't make enough of that out to figure out the licensing terms.. is
it more friendly than the IEC standard?

I downloaded the preview PDF, and it appears to refer to the IEC
standard directly.

Regards,

Peter C.


-- 
Peter Clifton

Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA

Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)



_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user