[f-cpu] last word about license ;-) was Re: encore une couche (was: Re:[f-cpu] License issues GPL/LGPL andJuergen Goeritz' SoC)

[Andreas Romeyke <art1@it-netservice.de>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello,

On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Yann Guidon wrote:

> i think that we will probably adopt this strategy (if everybody agrees, and
> principally Michael) But the problem of the GPL remains : we will have to
> "redefine" several terms of the licence, and it would be better to rewrite
> it completely to avoid any misunderstanding.

I discussed this topic a while back- and towards at GAOS. The meaning was
"if you are the owner of intellectual property, you can explicitly
describe in which context/topic you want to interprete the GPL (or another
license). It's independend to that what other means (aka RMS), because he
(or another) is not the owner of this intellectual property"

It is easy, is not it?
It is right, is not it?
It is described in F-CPU-manual, is not it?

Bye Andreas

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE7rE8CClxplZklbgERAjnGAJ9UZ8XmIpoy7goG9euK+JSUZJqx6QCfeSvN
KQ60rV0wb1IGSl1VxhSFkSo=
=9Z+Q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

*************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@seul.org with
unsubscribe f-cpu       in the body. http://f-cpu.seul.org/