[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: zview/ngscope




> Integration of simulator and gschem - that is gschem developers
> business, but I do not think it will ever happened due to obvious reason
> - there is no in OSS standard simulator which everyone uses. I prefer

Just my 2 eurocents of free speech and whine... There could be little light in the end of tunnel if there was one simulator supported.
And supporting more simulators it should be easy if the support mechanism was ...um... well usable and congurable.

Also there could be better support gnetlist which would tell something like "You have put superconductor and ultimate insulator parallel. I can divide by zero but adding infinty and almost zero gives  interesting results which you propably don't want." Like CLang compiler in programming world.

> GUI is just a candy - too much sugar and no health, it significantly limits tool
> capability.... By the way, I remember sourceforge has at list one GUI
> with interface to simulator. I try this long time ago. Useless.

Partially true. Sometimes it is easier to manage project in xgschem2pcb than in terminal. Also GSpiceGUI would be good tool if it helped during simulation. For me at least gschem, gnetlist and ngspice gave too steep learning curve and I gave up.

Link to good and thorough tutorial with explanations what is simulated would be very nice.

What I really want to do is put AVR simulator and SPICE to work together. So when Ihave badly designed power supply, source with MCU LEDs and run another in PWM mode I can see how I wrongly loaded the power supply and what happens then with currents. Someone else wants to simulate completely different things. But that is something far away.

Also distributed simualtions would be awesome. However I think signal analysis doesn't work in parallel very well.

But before there is ultimate simulation system which can simulate everything we want I believe enhancing gnetlist would be the best way and adding some simulation rule checking.

Best regards,
Hannu Vuolasaho
>
> Thanks,
> Alex.
>
> On 04/04/2011 03:04 AM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> > A.Burinskiy wrote:
> >
> >> Due to name conflict I rename program zview to ngscope, did minor
> >> corrections and submit it to sourceforge again.
> > Just curious: Why are there so many projects for viewers of simulation
> > data? I'd personally see the more immediate need in a better integration
> > of simulation with the gschem GUI.
> >
> > ---<)kaimartin(>---
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geda-user mailing list
> geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
 		 	   		  


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user