On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 19:42 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote: > I'm pondering a minor change in pcb's defaults to give us a more > useful default stackup. How's this? > > LAYERNAME (1, "top"), > LAYERNAME (2, "ground"), > LAYERNAME (3, "signal2"), > LAYERNAME (4, "signal3"), > LAYERNAME (5, "power"), > LAYERNAME (6, "bottom"), > LAYERNAME (7, "outline"), > LAYERNAME (8, "spare"), I'm very keen to see this change. The PCB+GL renderer (for example), needs layers (actually layer group numbers) in the correct physical order to be able to figure out how to render 3D views. Our current default stack is totally useless for that. -- Peter Clifton Electrical Engineering Division, Engineering Department, University of Cambridge, 9, JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0FA Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!) Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user