On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 22:35 +0200, Krzysztof KoÅciuszkiewicz wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:25:19PM +0100, Peter Clifton wrote: > > > What about the cases where this is a mistake? The net= attribute was > > supposed to refer to some implicit power pin - not the device's one > > symbolic pin, but the user forgot the suffix. > > The special case applies only to symbols with a single pin, so no such > error is possible here. What about symbols with one pin, and multiple net= attributes providing hidden "pins". -- Peter Clifton Electrical Engineering Division, Engineering Department, University of Cambridge, 9, JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0FA Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!) Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user