Re: gEDA-user: PCB gcode generation

[Alberto Maccioni <alberto.maccioni@xxxxxxxxx>]

> Probably we won't agree on that ever. The patchset is there, do with it what
> you think is the best thing to do.

At the time I posted very specific objections to some of the patches;
if you didn't bother to answer is your problem.
Of course none of the developers will ever commit a patch that breaks
functionality for any of the users.


2011/4/29 Markus Hitter <mah@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> Am 29.04.2011 um 08:47 schrieb Alberto Maccioni:
>
>>>> ... but it broke the "minimum distance" path optimization,
>>>
>>> This was fixed the day you mentioned it. Perhaps a day later :-)
>>
>> Probably you didn't notice that it is still boken, as I wrote again.
>
> Probably we won't agree on that ever. The patchset is there, do with it what
> you think is the best thing to do.
>
>
> Markus
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> Dipl. Ing. (FH) Markus Hitter
> http://www.jump-ing.de/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geda-user mailing list
> geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
>


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user