Re: gEDA-user: PCB pcblib-newlib and

[Michael Stovenour <mstovenour@xxxxxxxxx>]

>From: John Luciani <jluciani@xxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 10:00:22 AM
>Subject: Re: gEDA-user: PCB pcblib-newlib and
>
>On Dec 19, 2007 8:54 AM, Michael Stovenour <mstovenour@xxxxxxxxx>
 wrote:
>> Is there a reason that the header footprints in the standard
 libraries have 30 mil holes 
>>on one side and 38 mil on the other?  I thought
 most headers were 25 mil square pins 
>>on both rows (needing a ~38 mil
 hole).  I'm about to replace all the headers on my 
>>design with a modified
 set.
>
>Sounds like a mistake.

Well they are easy enough to fix, but I can't rely on the standard library because it is over written when I do an update.  I guess I could fix it in my CVS source directories; these are unlikely to have merge conflicts in the future.  Is it worth trying to fix the official CVS or is changing footprints in the standard library a can of worms?

>(* jcl *)


-- 
http://www.luciani.org


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user





_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user