[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: Parts Data deffinitions



Steve Meier wrote:
Project matters of course, and is a good place to define different DRCs.

> 3) If the project is a circuitboard then before then before the netlist
> can be generated at least the package has to be selected (passive) and
> often the device (active).
> A device complete with package and required values, manufacturor is
> called a "component"? If the project is a circuit either asic or fpga
> then generic types are probably going to be translated into standard
> logic cells?

I just decided to trash a part I thought was "nifty" for assembly difficulty reasons.
pcb parts have constraints such as placement courtyard in a 2D sense,
but package height is a big deal too,
and the 3D zone it needs to reserve during assembly
maybe deserves its own data type such as:

	*   placement keepout volume
	*   placement robot keepout
	*   placement no-fly zone
	*   placement skyprint
	*   placement collision volume
	*   placement canyon
	*   placement wall

Wall seems the most compact terminology (in English) to refer to this by.

John Griessen

Ecosensory   Austin TX


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user