[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: gEDA-user: Parts Data deffinitions
Steve Meier wrote:
Project matters of course, and is a good place to define different DRCs.
> 3) If the project is a circuitboard then before then before the netlist
> can be generated at least the package has to be selected (passive) and
> often the device (active).
> A device complete with package and required values, manufacturor is
> called a "component"? If the project is a circuit either asic or fpga
> then generic types are probably going to be translated into standard
> logic cells?
I just decided to trash a part I thought was "nifty" for assembly difficulty reasons.
pcb parts have constraints such as placement courtyard in a 2D sense,
but package height is a big deal too,
and the 3D zone it needs to reserve during assembly
maybe deserves its own data type such as:
* placement keepout volume
* placement robot keepout
* placement no-fly zone
* placement skyprint
* placement collision volume
* placement canyon
* placement wall
Wall seems the most compact terminology (in English) to refer to this by.
John Griessen
Ecosensory Austin TX
_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user