[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: A Suggestion FOR Karel



On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 06:11:44AM +0100, kmk wrote:
> Marvin Dickens wrote:
> >>>>I don't know why you don't have one, but I think it would be a big help.
> >>>>If you don't have time/serverspace/knowledge/whatever, I can help you
> >>>>set one up.
> 
> > PCB is approaching two decades in age. [...]
> 
> Obviously there are two BTS issues:
> 
> 1) There is (currently?) is BTS for gschem and friends
> 
> 2) The BTS for pcb is not mentioned on the gEDA site.

I think that gEDA should have one bugtracking. Or is Cadence, Eagle or
Protel calling different hotlines depending if the problem happened
during schematic capture or printed board design?

CL<
> 
> 
> > Did you know that PCB is its own project and is not part of gEDA?
> 
> Well, the geda site is a bit ambiguous on that subject. There is "gEDA",
> there is "gaf" and there is "gEDA/gaf".
> And there is this quote from the first page of http://geda.seul.org/
> /---------
> | Currently, the gEDA project offers  [...] and printed circuit board
> | (PCB) layout.
> \---------
> 
> Anyway, to me as a user it should be irrelevant where the developers
> draw the line between the projects.
> 
> 
> > never bothered read the most basic of text files that shipped with the 
> > program.
> 
> I installed the Debian package. The install did not produce any error
> and I was able to follow the tutorial. Why should I bother to read the
> INSTALL file? (Of course, I would, if I encountered problems). I'd spend
> months, if I thoroughly read the README files of half the packages on my
> system in advance.
> And no, if I discover a bug, I usually do not check check whether the
> project maintains a BTS. Instead I report the bug to the Debian BTS and
> the Debian maintainer will forward the report to upstream. This system
> is IMHO more efficient than reporting every bug directly to the
> corresponding developer.
> 
> ---<(kaimartin)>---
> -- 
> Kai-Martin Knaak
> kmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Blog: http://lilalaser.dyndns.org/blog