[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

gEDA-user: why separate xgsch2pcb?

To: gEDA user mailing list <geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: gEDA-user: why separate xgsch2pcb?
From: Chris Cole <clecol@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 09:39:24 -0500
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 09:39:48 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=rnLSGqRDy9NCRyWRI5Ikkbs5BdugP1Jpe9X4AWLwsiM=; b=ih88CTz7iWClww9gaKXrFSV06BmFLXhcVL7V0uqfU7cOvQ4nSyh4r58kKTZHLkDc9k ZN4SR0L4kdG28tYP2zlisXsJNsgRGJDJtuAE0/lVS87bYeIoxGzbml/xLiBM913cEeJb 2ltHLiHTnVs4kHgQZnLWqY9FA3fvJNec2koFg=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=lWRyjnKiHURMVa8ywV6dUPv2orwidbICZYkZrNp/D/kDhAmpbsNPdoNO0GhyzrpE4C OXXzrw9NmsCtCP1/JNmlJK4HPgNuNhSi+XZ64ge6VessufuJMh1/NuAItmQNOZfukR7d 1nIglVAK4edYgVTvZtbuoi9+HzaItXeTJ64ps=
List-archive: <http://www.seul.org/pipermail/geda-user>
List-help: <mailto:geda-user-request@moria.seul.org?subject=help>
List-id: gEDA user mailing list <geda-user.moria.seul.org>
List-post: <mailto:geda-user@moria.seul.org>
List-subscribe: <http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user>, <mailto:geda-user-request@moria.seul.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/geda-user>, <mailto:geda-user-request@moria.seul.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: gEDA user mailing list <geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: geda-user-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817)

Just curious, why not include xgsch2pcb functionality inside of gschem?

Chris


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gEDA-user: why separate xgsch2pcb?
  - From: Jason
- Re: gEDA-user: why separate xgsch2pcb?
  - From: Peter Clifton

Prev by Author: Re: gEDA-user: very simple gnucap simulation
Next by Author: Re: gEDA-user: why separate xgsch2pcb?
Previous by thread: gEDA-user: panelizing
Next by thread: Re: gEDA-user: why separate xgsch2pcb?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread