[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: Eagle to gEDA conversion path??



ulp is eagle script file.
i assumed if you wanted to convert something, you'd have eagle running.
im pretty sure ulp can access to library data as well, so something to
output ascii can be easily written.

diptrace is payware pcbcad, but freely downloadable version also
includes these 2 conversion scripts. (Eagle_to_DipTrace_SCH.ulp and
Eagle_to_DipTrace_PCB.ulp).

since eagle .sch/.pcb format isnt documented and no external libs
available to read it (as far as i know), the only way to export
anything is write/use a script run inside eagle.

On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Dave N6NZ <n6nz@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Feb 22, 2010, at 9:08 PM, timecop wrote:
>
>> Diptrace has a pair of ulp scripts to convert eagle project to ascii
>> schematic and pcb.
> OK, although I don't know what either Diptrace or ulp are.  Sounds like a good place to start, though.
>
> I'm wondering how the library issue would be handled.  Presumably, it reads the Eagle library and spits out symbol information as part of the ascii?
>
>> after some creative editing to make output format match geda, it
>> should be fairly feature compelte
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 1:36 PM, al davis <ad252@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> <snip>
>>>
>>> I proposed a translator system, using an intermediate language,
>>> to translate both ways between schematic, layout, and
>>> simulation.  It needs to happen.
>
> Really?  Is there a use for gEDA->Eagle?
>
> I never would have cared about Eagle, except that the RepRap PCB's are done with Eagle.  Now, why someone would do open source hardware with closed source tools is a mystery to me... but anyway.... so far in a total of 30 minutes of Eagle usage I've discovered: 1) the crippleware version only allows a single schematic sheet, leading people to create unreadable glop, and 2) printing is truly bizarre.  I can't imagine someone going from gEDA to the free/crippled version of Eagle.  And as to going to the commercial version, OK I can see some customer requiring that, but isn't that Eagle's problem?  After all, nobody is hiding gEDA's file formats.
>
> -dave
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geda-user mailing list
> geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
>


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user