meant to send to list. -dave
--- Begin Message ---
- To: John Luciani <jluciani@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: gEDA-user: "Publication Quality" Schematic Symbols
- From: Dave N6NZ <n6nz@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 12:33:13 -0800
- In-reply-to: <608bfe540801261140j3fad0ac1ic3a2c9cfb525a63b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <608bfe540801260851r4b020203tbbb482764b38d84a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <479B8585.1050108@xxxxxxxx> <608bfe540801261140j3fad0ac1ic3a2c9cfb525a63b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: n6nz@xxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051201)
John Luciani wrote:For my part, I was pickled in ANSI symbols decades ago, so pretty much anything other than ANSI doesn't seem quite right to me :) I keep doodling ideas for an ANSI symbol generator, but it never seems to be a higher priority than just getting on with building stuff.Do you have any links to ANSI symbol specifications?Them's that has it paid for it.Here is a link to an ANSI/IEEE logic symbol document that is available on line. Except for using a bubble for inverted I/O instead of a hollow half arrow, it's pretty much the symbols I am used to. (All boxes, no shovels and shields.)http://www.ddpp.com/DDPP3_pdf/IEEEsyms.pdf Here's the way I was taught to draw inverters: v 20060123 1 B 300 0 400 400 3 0 0 0 -1 -1 0 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 P 0 200 300 200 1 0 0 P 1000 200 700 200 1 0 0 B 300 600 400 400 3 0 0 0 -1 -1 0 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 P 0 800 300 800 1 0 0 P 1000 800 700 800 1 0 0 L 900 800 700 900 3 0 0 0 -1 -1 L 100 200 100 300 3 0 0 0 -1 -1 L 300 200 100 300 3 0 0 0 -1 -1 -dave
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user