[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: gEDA-user: Power (and other non-graphical) pins
I don't see why the slotdef attribute can't have a grammar such as
slotdef=2:1~v,2~v,13~v,7~h,14~h which says show pins 1, 2 and 3 but
hide the fourth and fifth pin following pins.
I don't see how this type of change would reduce flexibility.
Ales,
Where on http://geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:faq is the word goal even used?
The word is "approach" is only used to argue against monolithic
programs. So I dispute that the goals/approaches are clearly documented
on this page. I fully agree with
tool_xxx_is_missing_critical_feature_yyy_what_can_i_do
I also think telling users to go away is counter productive. One
management technique that I have learned (I think in the army) is that
some talks with people should be done one on one and not as a dressing
down in public!
Steve Meier
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 17:43 -0500, Ales Hvezda wrote:
> All,
>
> Oh no, not again... We have already had this _exact_ same endless
> discussion a couple of months ago. People, please go back into the
> archives and re-read the previous discussion and take all follow up
> offline. Please?
>
> [ snip everything cause it has been hashed out before ]
>
> Joerg,
>
> Posting the same complaints again and again, does *not* help your cause
> and will not generate any action/attention/sympathy.
>
> Again, please read and act upon the advice given at:
>
> http://geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:faq#tool_xxx_is_missing_critical_feature_yyy_what_can_i_do
>
> In particular bullets one and three. I think that all developer goodwill
> and kindness (bullet two) has already been spent in full.
>
> In the end, my final recommendation is that you go out and purchase a
> commercial EDA package that meets all of _your_ needs. This project is
> really not for people who are unwilling/unable to accept the published
> goals/approach [1].
>
> Let's all try very hard to avoid such repeat threads in the future.
> Thank you,
>
> -Ales
>
> [1] The gEDA project's goals/approach are clearly documented at:
>
> http://geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:faq
>
> Please read it in full. If you do not agree with these goals, please
> find some other mailing lists to inhabit. Thank you.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geda-user mailing list
> geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user