On Saturday 17 January 2009 16:41:13 Peter Clifton wrote:
> > ...but I don't think it's unreasonable to specify one line ending in
> > particular for the nuts and bolts of the gEDA file format. :) Hence my
> > amended spec.
>
> Personally, I'd favour emitting \n, and tolerating \r\n.
Sounds good. The current file format tolerates \r\n, so that should be fine.
> Any embedding should use whatever the natural line-ending of the embedded
> file is, assuming it isn't encoded.
Yep: my spec says that the "literal" encoding can use any UTF-8 characters,
and \r\n line endings are a subset of that.
Peter
--
Peter Brett
Electronic Systems Engineer
Integral Informatics Ltd
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user