Re: gEDA-user: taking issue with Symbol creation

[John Doty <jpd@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Jan 7, 2010, at 7:10 PM, Mark Rages wrote:

> Would it be possible to define some defaults (no pinseq, default to
> pinnumber) to avoid cluttering up the symbol files in the common case?
>  We could even use the asciibetical sorted pinnumber values and get a
> reasonable sequence for BGA-type numbers.

A default probably doesn't make sense, because if you actually need  
pinseq it's rarely related to pinnumber in any simple way. Better to  
have gnetlist complain. But most flows don't need it at all.

John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
http://www.noqsi.com/
jpd@xxxxxxxxx




_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user